Are you looking for comparison between Hostinger and Bluehost? Want to know which is better? Having trouble deciding between Hostinger and Bluehost? So here I have tried to compare both the well know host to into details.
If you’re looking for cheap but reliable hosting, both Bluehost and Hostinger have caught your attention. Both of these entry-level hosts are excellent choices for people who run personal blogs and small businesses since they provide a variety of hosting plans, features, and functionality at affordable pricing.
We’re in a great position to walk you through the advantages and disadvantages of Hostinger and Bluehost because we’ve done thorough research on the leading vendors on the market. We can confidently recommend which host is best for you because we’ve thoroughly compared their features, value for money, uptime, types of hosting provided, and more.Let’s get going!
Table of Content
Hostinger v/s Bluehost
History of Hostinger
Established in 2004, Hostinger International, Ltd. is an employee-owned web host and domain name registrar. The parent organization of 000webhost, Hosting24, Zyro, Niagahoster, and Weblink is called Hostinger.
The key advantages of Hostinger are its functionality and low price. It’s ideal for those on a tight budget seeking out special offers.
What Hostinger excels at:
- Budget-conscious users
- Those in need of cloud hosting services.
- Users who are not concerned with excessive downtime
History of Bluehost
Bluehost is a leading provider of web hosting services. Since our company’s inception in 2003, Bluehost has consistently come up with fresh approaches to carry out its aim of enabling individuals to completely utilize the online. Based in Orem, Utah, they offer extensive tools to millions of people worldwide so that anyone, expert or not, can access the internet and prosper with our web hosting plans.
In addition to its excellent WordPress hosting, Bluehost is known for its affordable rates. Out of all the web hosts we’ve studied so far, Bluehost has emerged as the best overall, according to our study.
What Bluehost excels at:
- Users of WordPress seeking fantastic WordPress hosting
- Those in need of plans for dedicated hosting (Hostinger does not provide dedicated hosting)
- Beginners seeking dependable client service
Plans and Pricing Comparison (Hostinger v/s Bluehost)
While Bluehost offers four core pricing tiers, Hostinger offers three. Both companies also offer add-ons and customised packages upon request. However, in terms of value for money, Hostinger outperforms its competitors by a significant margin.
While Bluehost offers four core pricing tiers, Hostinger offers three. Both companies also offer add-ons and customized packages upon request. However, in terms of value for money, Hostinger outperforms its competitors by a significant margin.
The cheapest Single Shared Hosting plan from Hostinger allows you to get going quickly and affordably. Depending on the billing term you select, the comparable Basic plan from Bluehost is three to five times more expensive. With Hostinger, you have more payment options. You may choose between paying monthly, annually, every 24 months, or every 48 months.
Just bear in mind that if you select a monthly plan, there is a minor setup cost associated with Hostinger’s single shared hosting plan (which I think is more than fair considering the low price point). The setup fee for all other plans is nothing. Additionally, you can select from Hostinger’s Premium Shared, Business Shared, and three cloud hosting options.
You can choose from the Basic, Plus, Choice Plus, or Pro packages with Bluehost. As previously indicated, you won’t have the same flexibility in the billing cycle and you’ll pay more than you would for a comparable Hostinger service. Currently, Bluehost only provides 12-, 24-, and 36-month subscriptions. You must look at the renewal costs of the plans while thinking about shared hosting pricing.
Feature Comparison
Bluehost doesn’t stop its upsells with customer service. Its prices cost more than Hostinger’s plans at launch, and you frequently need to purchase hefty add-ons to acquire the same capability as a comparable Hostinger package.
For instance, Hostinger plans all include an unlimited number of free email addresses. The sole shared plan, where you only receive one email address, is the lone exception. In contrast, Bluehost only provides one Microsoft 365 email account as part of its 30-day trial. After that, you’re obligated to spend extra for each and every email address you require.
In the end, Hostinger is more cost-effective than Bluehost and provides more services.
Pros
- Best in Price
- Customer Support
Cons
- Limited Live Support